Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Hiring a Mergers & Acquisitions Firm

Once a business owner has made a decision to sell their business, the next question is who will handle the process. There are only two choices – manage the process personally or delegate it to someone else - that someone else is called a business intermediary. This article is focused on helping you understand the benefits of using an intermediary.

Some business owners are capable of managing the process of selling a company, but frequently the benefits of hiring a professional mergers and acquisitions firm outweigh the costs. The key benefits are best remembered with the acronym SUCCESS: Strategic Fit, Understands the Process, Creates Multiple Options, Communication / Negotiation, Expectations are Managed, Stay Focused on the Business, and Sustained Momentum.

Let’s look at each of these benefits in more detail. Strategic Fit means there exists some synergy between the purchasing entity and the seller. This could take many forms, but a few examples include product, distribution, geographic, and management synergies. Product synergy occurs when the purchaser and seller have complementary products that when combined create greater value. Distribution synergy is evident when the purchaser has products that can be distributed through the seller’s customer base or vice versa. Another type of strategic fit is geographic synergy. This is where a purchaser needs a new geographic presence in which the seller is located. Management synergy occurs when management gaps are closed upon the purchase of a new company. A deal where there is a Strategic Fit between the buyer and seller often yields greater value.

An intermediary is usually more adept at demonstrating synergy between buyers and sellers. A good example to illustrate this point is with a past technology company client that was sold to a strategic buyer. After the first round of marketing there were two reasonable offers which were within 10% of each other, but neither was a strategic buyer. The second round of marketing targeted companies that had complementary products thereby creating a strategic fit. From this group, a third offer was secured from a strategic buyer that was twice the value of the previous two offers. The deal was closed several months later.

Understanding the seven step process of selling a company is a vital component to a successful transaction. Steps 1 and 2, which are comprised of the initial meeting and financial review are conducted to determine the probability of success and potential fit between the mergers and acquisitions firm and the seller. Step 3 is finalization of the agreement between the intermediary and the seller. The real process of marketing a company begins with Step 4 - pre-sale planning. Step 5 begins the actual marketing outreach. Steps 6 and 7 involve negotiation and transition planning.

The process of taking a company to market and moving it to closing is very complicated and time consuming. Very few business owners understand the process well enough to manage all facets, and they rarely have the time.

Creating Multiple Options relates to the ability to orchestrate and manage several buyers on one deal at the same time. The classic mistake a business owner makes when selling his business is dealing with one interested party at a time. The most common scenario we observe is as follows. A potential buyer contacts a business owner expressing an interest in his company. The owner responds by saying “sure, I would consider selling if the price is right.” The owner sends information to the buyer (frequently without an effective confidentiality agreement) and the information exchange begins. In the meantime, the buyer is doing nothing to generate additional interest from other prospective buyers. If and when the buyer finally makes an offer the owner has no idea if he is receiving a strong value, because he frequently has no other offers for comparison.

If the marketing outreach process is managed effectively, there is a greater probability of securing several interested parties on each deal. Multiple interested entities means greater clarity in evaluating the merits of each offer and increases the likelihood that a strong value will be received.

Communication and Negotiation is the foundation of every deal, but contrary to popular belief it is not the only step that matters. This is by far the most common stumbling block to most business owners. They perceive themselves to be excellent negotiators, therefore they assume they can negotiate the best possible deal forgetting that a lot more goes into “getting a good deal” than your ability to communicate.


Consider the owner who focuses exclusively on price in his negotiations. He may very well get his price not realizing the purchaser gladly agreed to it because the structure of the deal heavily favored the buyer. Another common development is “sowing seeds of discord.” In an attempt to negotiate the best position, the purchaser or seller unintentionally insults the other thereby creating an antagonistic relationship, which sticks with them throughout the process. Their ability to resolve minor disagreements is impeded. A professional intermediary is typically able to “remain above the fray” and eliminate personal feelings thereby increasing the chance of resolving disagreements.

Few sellers know what is reasonable to expect and how to manage Expectations. Is it reasonable to ask for a confidentiality agreement before releasing any information? How much information should I release initially? When should I meet with the buyer? When should I expect a letter of intent? What about earnest money – how much and when? Who drafts the purchase agreement? When do I tell my employees? How long will due diligence take? Who pays for due diligence? These are just a few of the questions that come up during the process. Knowing what is reasonable dictates how you respond to the buyer and demonstrates your skill level. This sends a strong signal to the buyer.

Many buyers will “tilt the table” in their advantage if they feel a seller is uninformed. The most common approach a buyer uses is “this is the way we always do it.” Since the seller has no idea what is reasonable, he naturally assumes the buyer’s request must be reasonable. For example, buyers frequently tell a seller they will not provide a letter of interest or value assessment before visiting the seller’s facility. When a seller consistently concedes this point to buyers, they end up investing a lot of time in “tire kickers” who are not serious candidates. A mergers and acquisitions firm knows what to expect, how to communicate it, and how to deal with any surprises that surface throughout the process.

The biggest risk a business owner faces when attempting to manage the process himself is the inability to Stay Focused on the Business during the sales process. The owner typically becomes distracted in two ways – time and mental energy. Given the time consuming nature of the process, it is easy for an owner to wake up one day and find he is spending the majority of his time on the transaction. In addition, when managing the process himself, the owner frequently becomes mentally drained. Both of these create a scenario where the business suffers during a critical time.

Tying in closely with focus is the importance of Sustained Momentum. The sale of a business is like any other process – momentum is critical. When you have positive momentum during the process, good things tend to happen. Conversely negative momentum tends to feed on itself.

The typical business owner runs into the following scenario quite often. He begins the process of selling his business, or worse yet, he responds to an inquiry. He invests considerable time in responding to information requests and the buyer begins to exhibit serious interest. The owner then becomes distracted with more pressing issues within his business such as a key employee deciding to leave. As his focus turns within the business, he begins to lose momentum with his prospective buyer, as they become frustrated with a lack of responsiveness. The buyer moves on to another deal, and the owner must start the process over again.

By delegating the process to an intermediary, the owner is able to focus on the business while the process operates in the background enabling him to be insulated from the ups and downs of the process. Momentum is sustained and prospective buyers are dealt with on a timely basis. Of course, even when an intermediary handles the process there are no guarantees the deal will close, but it will not be lost due to a lack of responsiveness or lack of focus on the deal at hand.

Mark Jordan is the managing principal of VERCOR, an investment bank that creates liquidity for middle market business owners. He is the author of Enhancing Your Business Value…The Climb to the Top, Selling Your Business The Hard Easy Way and co-author of The Business Sale…A Business Owner’s Most Perilous Expedition. He is also the author of numerous articles. For more information email him or visit www.vercoradvisor.com.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

IPO Slowdown: Is It Good or Bad for the Middle Market?

The first quarter of 2008 witnessed a drastic slowdown in IPO offerings. Data from Thomson Financials indicates a massive reduction of 46.1 % in US IPO proceeds. The study also points to a 15 % drop in IPO volume for January 2008. Further painting a bleak picture is IPO proceeds worth $6.3 billion fading away from the global market owing to withdrawal of 21 IPOs in January 2008. This figure is significantly three times higher than what it was for December 2007 when only 16 IPOs collectively valued at $2.1 billion were withdrawn.

The primary cause for this IPO slowdown is considered to be the consistently dropping value of the US greenback. The weakening dollar resulting from a poor economy and a credit crunch in the US is causing frequent fluctuations in the global markets. Market upheavals over the past several months have made investors apprehensive about investing in IPOs. Instead, investors are playing the wait and watch game to tide over the rough weather.

The IPO slowdown is however not necessarily bad for everyone. It has brought in its wake wonderful merger and acquisition opportunities particularly for the middle market segment. According to a recent Baird's Investment Banking Group report, mergers and acquisitions among the small and medium sized enterprises will be much more active than other segments.

Baird defines middle market transactions as those under $1 billion. This makes the deals far more attractive than the multi-billion dollar
mergers and acquisitions. Buyers can now materialize their business ideas without spending a fortune. Plenty of buyers as well as sellers are available in the middle market segment. It is their attempt at expanding and strengthening existing assets. In line with the general sentiment, experts forecast enhanced M&A activity in the middle market segment through 2008.

In contrast, big ticket deals are expected to take a back seat owing to the tough
situation the credit market is presently facing. Economic instability has made it difficult to secure large amounts of financing that mega-deals warrant. Due to the IPO slowdown, the bigger players have decided to wait for the economic conditions to improve or at least stabilize before making the next move.

Studies show 2007 to be replete with vigorous merger and acquisition activities in the technology sector. Many of the deals happened between European countries and the US. Experts indicate further consolidation of these markets through 2008 with buyers resorting to creative ways of acquiring companies.

In addition to Technology, other sectors Baird identifies as favorable for merger and acquisitions include Telecom, Energy, Materials and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO). Strategic business combinations are slated to replace superficial mergers that are oftentimes destined for failure from the beginning. True evaluation based on tangible value is the driving force behind present day deals.

Today's middle market mergers may seem similar to the heightened M&A activity in the late 1990s when the IT boom was at its peak. However, it is different in the basic ways it transpires in the current environment. At that time, deals were signed on the basis of the number of visitors to a web site and other data which painted a rosy picture of an otherwise ailing venture. Because of the in-depth assessment of today's consolidations, a deal recession similar to the one that happened at the beginning of this century seems unlikely.

Private equity is also playing a key role in acquiring cross-border companies. In fact, these acquirers invested $55.5 billion within the first two quarters of 2007 in 29 deals. A continued drop in the value of the dollar and the availability of investors with loaded pockets make market analysts predict the trend to continue in 2008. Which way the tide turns remains to be seen. It depends on several important parameters including the appreciation or depreciation of the US dollar and the overall US economy.

Mark Jordan is the managing principal of
VERCOR, an investment bank that creates liquidity for middle market business owners. He is the author of Enhancing Your Business Value…The Climb to the Top, Selling Your Business The Hard Easy Way and co-author of The Business Sale…A Business Owner’s Most Perilous Expedition. He is also the author of numerous articles. For more information email him or visit www.vercoradvisor.com.